Helping the Patient Through Change Assignment

Helping the Patient Through Change Assignment
Consider how the renal nurse would apply the nursing process to a patient going through the five stages of the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change (Thomas, 2014).

Select one of these 5 stages:
Pre-contemplation
Contemplator
Preparation
Action
Maintenance

Helping the Patient Through Change Assignment

In a 500-word paper, provide specific examples of how a nurse could support the patient in meeting the goals of positive self-care behaviors.

Allow the rubric to guide your content for this assignment.
Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric\’s layout.

Content
Name: NEPH513-HelpingThePatientThroughChange
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Assessing
Points Range:4.32 (14.40%) – 5.4 (18.00%)
Comprehensive evidence of data gathering, demonstrates a full understanding of the situation, shows consideration of health history and physical examination.
Points Range:3.51 (11.70%) – 4.266 (14.22%)
Good evidence of data gathering, demonstrates some understanding of the situation, shows consideration of health history and physical examination.
Points Range:3.24 (10.80%) – 3.456 (11.52%)
Adequate evidence of data gathering, demonstrates partial understanding of the situation, shows consideration of health history and physical examination.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.186 (10.62%)
Poor evidence of data gathering, understanding of the situation, and poor consideration of health history and physical examination.
Diagnosing
Points Range:4.32 (14.40%) – 5.4 (18.00%)
Comprehensive identification of the problem, evidence of thoughtful interpretation and logical perspective.
Points Range:3.51 (11.70%) – 4.266 (14.22%)
Good identification of the problem, evidence of thoughtful interpretation and logical perspective.
Points Range:3.24 (10.80%) – 3.456 (11.52%)
Adequate identification of the problem, evidence of thoughtful interpretation and logical perspective.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.186 (10.62%)
Poor identification of the problem, evidence of thoughtful interpretation and logical perspective.
Planning
Points Range:4.32 (14.40%) – 5.4 (18.00%)
Comprehensive identification of issues to be addressed, demonstration of prioritization of issues, consideration of resources, and evidence of appropriate action and a plan of care.
Points Range:3.51 (11.70%) – 4.266 (14.22%)
Good identification of issues to be addressed, demonstration of prioritization of issues, consideration of resources, and evidence of appropriate action and a plan of care.
Points Range:3.24 (10.80%) – 3.456 (11.52%)
Adequate identification of issues to be addressed, demonstration of prioritization of issues, consideration of resources, and evidence of appropriate action and a plan of care.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.186 (10.62%)
Poor identification of issues to be addressed, demonstration of prioritization of issues, consideration of resources, and evidence of appropriate action and a plan of care.
Implementing
Points Range:4.32 (14.40%) – 5.4 (18.00%)
Comprehensive evidence of standard language in communication, use of protocols and evidence of appropriate actions.
Points Range:3.51 (11.70%) – 4.266 (14.22%)
Good evidence of standard language in communication, use of protocols and evidence of appropriate actions.
Points Range:3.24 (10.80%) – 3.456 (11.52%)
Adequate evidence of standard language in communication, use of protocols and evidence of appropriate actions.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.186 (10.62%)
Poor evidence of standard language in communication, use of protocols and evidence of appropriate actions.
Evaluating
Points Range:4.32 (14.40%) – 5.4 (18.00%)
Comprehensive analysis of the success/failure of the plan as well as reassessment of the patient’s overall health and interventions in consideration of the outcome achieved.
Points Range:3.51 (11.70%) – 4.266 (14.22%)
Good analysis of the success/failure of the plan as well as reassessment of the patient’s overall health and interventions in consideration of the outcome achieved.
Points Range:3.24 (10.80%) – 3.456 (11.52%)

Helping the Patient Through Change Assignment
Adequate analysis of the success/failure of the plan as well as reassessment of the patient’s overall health and interventions in consideration of the outcome achieved.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.186 (10.62%)
Poor analysis of the success/failure of the plan as well as reassessment of the patient’s overall health and interventions in consideration of the outcome achieved.
APA, Articles
Points Range:2.4 (8.00%) – 3 (10.00%)
Submission consistently follows current APA format, demonstrates evidence of current, relevant evidence-based practice and a minimum of three current research articles supports this work that are no older than 10 years.
Points Range:1.95 (6.50%) – 2.37 (7.90%)
Submission somewhat follows current APA format and/or somewhat demonstrates evidence of current, relevant evidence-based practice and/or there are less than three current research articles supporting this work and/or some are older than 10 years.
Points Range:1.8 (6.00%) – 1.92 (6.40%)
Submission rarely follows current APA format or does not demonstrate evidence of current, relevant evidence-based practice and/or there are less than three current research articles supporting this work and some are older than 10 years.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 1.77 (5.90%)
Submission does not follow current APA format, does not demonstrate evidence of current, relevant evidence-based practice, there are less than three current research articles supporting this work and some are older than 10 years.
Name:NEPH513-HelpingThePatientThroughChange

 

Helping the Patient Through Change Assignment Related Posts:

 

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)