Question: 1. Theory Identification: (10 Marks) Examine Whether The Given Decision Is Best Characterized As Appealing To Deontology, Teleology, Axiology, Moral Particularism, Or Something Else. 2. Moral Diagnosis: (22 Marks) . Examine How The Moral Problem In This Case Are Being Framed By The Participants. Assess The Situation By Considering The Followings: What …

1. Theory Identification: (10 marks) Examine whether the given decision is best characterized as appealing to deontology, teleology, axiology, moral particularism, or something else. 2. Moral Diagnosis: (22 marks) . Examine how the moral problem in this case are being framed by the participants. Assess the situation by considering the followings: What is the patient’s medical condition? Predictions and uncertainties regarding prognosis (What are the probabilities for full or partial recovery? Is the patient terminally ill?). Treatment recommendations and reasonable alternatives. What are the relevant contextual factors? . . HNR3.142 A3 Sesament2 Set Exercise Case Analysis Page 25 A mozah alzahmi HNR 3142-Assessment 2 Coursework Set Exercise Final – Saved View Draw Design Layout References Mailings Review Help Case Scenario 1: Faisal is a 95 year old male patient who has been residing in a nursing home care facility for the past 8 years. Faisal is a dementia patient and can occasionally only recall few members of his family every not so often. Faisal has a Foley’s catheter and has been having bloody urine for the past few days. Faisal was transferred to the hospital and with further investigations, he was diagnosed with severe urine infection. His urine infection was treated with antibiotics and he was returned to his nursing home care facility. Faisal’s urine infection returned less than a month after treatment. The physicians in the hospital thinks that it’s due to poor Foley’s catheter care. Faisal was transferred again to the hospital for treatment of what seems a chronic urine infections. Faisal has been very aggressive during his stay at the hospital with all the physicians and nurses as he prefers his nurses in the nursing home care facility. He has now developed antibiotic resistance and is under treatment. Faisal was treated and sent back to the nursing home care facility where he developed another infection after two weeks. The hospital physicians’ team have recommended that the investigations and treatment are done while he is in the nursing home care facility and that there is no need for his transfer to the hospital as he is becoming very agitated during his hospital visits and his hospital experience was very stressful for him and for the hospital staff. The nursing home care facility management team discussed the hospital’s recommendation with Faisal’s family and discussed the consequences of the different decisions. After that, a decision has been made that nothing would be achieved by another hospital admission that could not be achieved by the nursing staff at the nursing home facility. The staff and his family claimed that the right thing to do is not going for further hospital admission and therefore, his welfare would be maximized by staying in the home care facility rather than being transferred to the hospital again.