NSG6002 week 1 Project Diabetes

NSG6002 week 1 Project Diabetes

This paper is to be completed from weeks 1-4, with final submission week 4. The topic is Diabetes and how we can reduce the number of diagnosed patients and improve quality of life. I have attached the rubric for what the professor expects each week, this week focusing on week 1. The professor is strict on APA and just wants a brief rough draft of what the final 8-page paper will entail.

NSG6002 - Rubrics

Weekly Discussion Rubric

Here's a YouTube video on how to view the comments entered by your professor.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCvMmh07QVQ

 

Response	No Submission 0 points	Emerging (F-D: 1-27) 27 points	Satisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 points	Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points	Exemplary (A: 36-40) 40 points
Quality of Initial Posting	No initial posting exists to evaluate.	The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation.  A discussion of the founding of the AANP didn’t address the issue of workplace violence.	The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment.	The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed.	The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in-depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings.
Participation	No Submission 0 points	Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points	Satisfactory (C: 14-16) 16 points	Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points	Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points
Participation in Discussion	No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum.	May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other student's post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or “I agree. *Comments are off topic.	Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.	Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.	Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructor's comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful conversation and may include a follow-up question.
Writing	No Submission 0 points	Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 10 points	Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points	Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points	Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points
Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy	No postings for which to evaluate language and grammar exist.	Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling, use of slang, and incomplete or missing citations and references. If required for the assignment, did not use course, text, and/or outside readings (where relevant) to support work. Multiple errors in sentence construction, punctuation, word use, singular, plural words.  APA formatting is incorrect.  No citations in text.	Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for initial post but not comments to other students. Sources include course/text readings but outside sources (when relevant) include non-academic/authoritative, such as Wikis and .com resources.	Minor errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial posting are present. Minor errors in formatting citations and references may exist. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and some of the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules). For correct citations’ formatting see:: See how to cite journals at  https://owl.english.purdue.edu/ owl/resource/560/07/	Minor to no errors exist in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in both the initial post and comments to others. Formatting of citations and references is correct. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules).
Overall Score	No Submission 0 or more	Emerging (F to D Range) 1 or more	Satisfactory (C Range) 56 or more	Proficient (B Range) 64 or more	Exemplary (A Range) 72 or more
	There was no submission for this assignment.	Satisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies for this assignment.	Satisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.	Proficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.	The competencies for this assignment have been mastered.
					80

Electronic books -  vitalsource: Reflowable Text VitalBooks and Page-Fidelity VitalBooks.

Reflowable Text VitalBooks and Page-Fidelity VitalBooks.

(Kernis et al., 1993)

 

Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 1 Project Rubric

Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 51 points Satisfactory 59 points Proficient 66 points Exemplary 75 points Health Topic Describe a single health promotion/disease prevention problem from the Healthy People 2020 Objectives Introduction to population or problem Describe incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden etc., Student did not submit assignment Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment. Description of specific population, program or organization Discuss how the policy is intended for a specific population, program or organization Specific legislators involved Identify and discuss specific legislators involved in the policy development and Student did not submit assignment Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts. Policy, practice and outcomes Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes Policy, practice and the inter-professional team Examine how the policy can be used by the inter-professional team to ensure coordinated Student did not submit assignment Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 16 points Satisfactory 19 points Proficient 21 points Exemplary 25 points Comprehensive Review of Literature Perform and demonstrate a comprehensive review of the current evidence. Use of primary sources and evidence that is not older than 5 years Writing, grammar and APA application Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition. Student did not submit assignment Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors. Overall Score No Evidence 0 or more Unsatisfactory 169 or more Satisfactory 196 or more Proficient 219 or more Exemplary 250 or more Your Score

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top of Form

Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric

Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 41 points Satisfactory 46 points Proficient 53 points Exemplary 60 points Identify specific legislative District State Governor, areas of focus and interest State Senators, committees and appointments Student did not submit assignment Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 37 points Satisfactory 43 points Proficient 48 points Exemplary 55 points State Representatives (House), committees and appointments Federal Senators, committee and appointments Student did not submit assignment Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 34 points Satisfactory 40 points Proficient 44 points Exemplary 50 points Federal (House & Senate), committees and appointments. Any state specific legislation involving legislators Student did not submit assignment Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. No peer-reviewed citations provided. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 6 points Satisfactory 7 points Proficient 8 points Exemplary 10 points Writing, grammar and APA application: Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition formatting, use of headers and primary sources Student did not submit assignment Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors. Overall Score No Evidence 0 or more Unsatisfactory 118 or more Satisfactory 135 or more Proficient 153 or more Exemplary 175 or more Your Score

Bottom of Form

 

 

Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 3 Project Rubric

Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 41 points Satisfactory 46 points Proficient 57 points Exemplary 60 points Legislation Type State or federal, scope of practice, reimbursement, loan repayment etc. Review of the Literature Use a min of 3-4 primary sources of evidence. Not older than 5 years Student did not submit assignment Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 37 points Satisfactory 43 points Proficient 48 points Exemplary 55 points Current Policy What is the current policy or health policy issue and how might it impact nursing or healthcare? Proposed Policy or Pending Changes to Policy What are they? Be specific. You may have multiple changes in one piece of legislation Student did not submit assignment Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts. Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 34 points Satisfactory 35 points Proficient 44 points Exemplary 50 points Stakeholders Who benefits from the changes? Who supports the changes/legislation? Outcomes How will this impact nursing practice and the healthcare system? Student did not submit assignment Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics.  Either one or no credible (peer-reviewed journals or sources) used. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.  Good sources!! Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 6 points Satisfactory 7 points Proficient 8 points Exemplary 10 points Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary. Provides credible resources using correct APA format. Student did not submit assignment Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors. One or no peer-reviewed sources. Sources are more than 5 years old. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors. Please double check your grammar and punctuation.  Have someone else read the paper – or read it to yourself aloud --- it’s amazing how many mistakes you can ‘hear’. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors. Possible Overall Score No Evidence 0 or more Unsatisfactory 118 or more Satisfactory 135 or more Proficient 153 or more Exemplary 175 or more Your Score

 

https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Office-365-Blog/Four-Success-Factors-for-Driving-Microsoft-365-Adoption/ba-p/125098
Nonperiodical

 

 

Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 4 Project Rubric

Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 51 points Satisfactory 59 points Proficient 66 points Exemplary 75 points   Health Topic Describe a single health promotion/disease prevention problem from the Healthy People 2020 Objectives Introduction to population or problem Describe incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden etc., Student did not submit assignment Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.   Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 51 points Satisfactory 59 points Proficient 66 points Exemplary 75 points Description of specific population, program or organization Discuss how the policy is intended for a specific population, program or organization Specific legislators involved Identify and discuss specific legislators involved in the policy development and Student did not submit assignment Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.   Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 51 points Satisfactory 59 points Proficient 66 points Exemplary 75 points                   Policy, practice and outcomes Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes Policy, practice and the inter-professional team Examine how the policy can be used by the inter-professional team to ensure coordinated Student did not submit assignment Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.   Criteria No Evidence 0 points Unsatisfactory 16 points Satisfactory 19 points Proficient 21 points Exemplary 25 points   Comprehensive Review of Literature Perform and demonstrate a comprehensive review of the current evidence. Use of primary sources and evidence that is not older than 5 years Writing, grammar and APA application Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition fo Student did not submit assignment Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors.   Overall Score No Evidence 0 or more Unsatisfactory 169 or more Satisfactory 196 or more Proficient 219 or more Exemplary 250 or more   Your Score       246