Crohn’s Disease PowerPoint

Disease: Crohn’s Disease

Please include photos of the diseased bowels with examples.

The purpose of the Week 5 Disease Process Assignment Part 2 is for learners to:

  • Develop professional presentation/communication skills.
  • Link development of initial presenting signs and symptoms of disease to changes to tissue, organ and system functioning.
  • Describe how the disease is diagnosed
  • Describe pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for disease management.

Due Date at the end of Week 5

Course Outcomes

  1. Analyze pathophysiological mechanisms associated with select disease states.
  2. Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction.

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

In Week 7, students will present an audio/video PowerPoint presentation. To ensure timely development of the Week 7 assignment and an opportunity to receive feedback from the course faculty, students will develop the Week 7 presentation in 2 parts.  Parts 1 and 2 will be submitted as a PowerPoint presentation that contains thorough speaker notes. After students have received faculty feedback on Parts 1 and 2, students will develop the final presentation that is audio and video recorded and uploaded to the Week 7 Discussion Board.

Criteria for Content

  1. Link changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary careof the disease.
  2. Provide a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed.
  3. Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease.
  4. Summarizes the disease on the final slide with concluding remarks; includes implication for nurse practitioner practice.
  5. Utilizes at least two current (within 5 years), peer-review scholarly sources to support presentation content.
  6. Reference slide and in-text citations depict references correctly cited according to APA.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

Presentation Guidelines:

  • The presentation should include a PowerPoint presentation that contains detailed speaker notes.
  • The presentation contain main heading slides that address the assignment criteria listed above.
  • The presentation should contain appropriate evidence to support the information presented per APA format.
  • Slides should be used as cues to topics and key concepts without lengthy sentences and paragraphs
  • The presentation should contain a reference slide with all sources written in APA format.

Technology Requirements

The instructions for using Kaltura are located under Resources.

Rubric

Some Rubric

Some Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge
35.0 pts

The presentation includes all required concepts: Links changes in the tissue, organ and system functioning to the initial presenting signs symptoms seen in primary care. Provides a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed. Provides a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used in disease management.

32.0 pts

The presentation includes clear presentation of all required concepts and linkages, but may lack some applicability to topic or misses one criteria in some way.

27.0 pts

The presentation has limited perspective, unclear linkages, insights and/or applicability to topic or does not meet one or more of the criteria of the assignment.

22.0 pts

The presentation contains inaccurate information and is not consistent with current practice. No clear linkages provided. Analysis is minimal.

0.0 pts

The presentation offers no insight or application to the assignment or course content.

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
30.0 pts

Scholarly literature published within the last 5 years is present throughout the presentation. Guidelines regarding disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are addressed and clearly analyzed.

27.0 pts

Where applicable in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

24.0 pts

Where applicable in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence. Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. Guidelines are not used. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.

21.0 pts

Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

0.0 pts

Presentation contains no evidence-based practice reference or citation.

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Disease Process
25.0 pts

Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation. Implications for practice addressed.

23.0 pts

Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation. Implications for practice not clearly evident.

20.0 pts

Summarizes the disease using concise statements with some content not reflected in the summary. Implications for practice not clearly evident or missing.

18.0 pts

Summary of the disease process is lacking concise statements and all content not reflected in the summary. Implications for practice not addressed or not clearly evident.

0.0 pts

No summary of the disease process provided. Implications for practice not addressed.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism/ Organization
5.0 pts

The presentation content flows in a logical, smooth manner. Contains clear bullet points Speaker notes are complete and relate directly to the bullet points on each slide

4.0 pts

The presentation is lacks 1 component from the 5 point criteria.

3.0 pts

The recorded presentation is lacking 2 components from the 5 point criteria.

2.0 pts

Presentation presents findings that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic and concepts are difficult to follow.

0.0 pts

Slides contain lengthy content; Presentation style lacks flow of ideas and thoughts.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, APA
5.0 pts

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

4.0 pts

Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

3.0 pts

Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

2.0 pts

Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0.0 pts

Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation

Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

0.0 pts

0 Point Deduction

Submitted on or before the due date.

0.0 pts

100% Point Deduction (100 Points Deducted)

Submitted more than 3 days late.

0.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext